Archive for May, 2010

Toyota Litigation: The Black Box Smoking Gun

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Many people do not realize that automobiles including eight million Toyotas facing recall for product defects have black boxes called Event Data Recorders (EDRs) that may explain the cause of many Tennessee acceleration auto accidents.  Recent reports suggest that Toyota has taken affirmative steps to prevent the disclosure of this black box data.  The auto accident lawyers of Nahon, Saharovich & Trotz, PLC (NST Law) recognize the importance of aggressively seeking EDR data to obtain fair compensation for serious injuries or death suffered by you or your loves ones caused by Toyota acceleration auto accidents or other serious auto accidents.

The majority of auto manufacturers routinely provide access to this black box data which can provide information including vehicle speed, accelerator angle, gear shift position, seatbelt use, driver’s seat angle, brake position and antilock brake system information.  However, recent AP reports indicate Toyota Corporation has frequently declined to provide this data to crash victims.  Toyota uses a propriety software program that reportedly was loaded on only a single laptop.  Toyota has a history of settling lawsuits when plaintiff’s attorneys pressure Toyota to provide discovery of the EDR data or providing a redacted version with key information blacked out.

The AP reports also suggest that Toyota may have misrepresented what information is even recorded by an EDR in a Toyota vehicle.  When the AP initially inquired about what information was recorded by the EDR, Toyota officials failed to include any mention of brake position or the antilock brake system.  When AP again contacted Toyota, the company admitted that brake position and antilock brake system information is recorded by the EDR.

Following an Indiana crash, Toyota representatives told the family of the victim that there was “no sensor that would have preserved information regarding the accelerator and brake position at the time of impact.”  The victim in the Indiana crash prior to her death had explained to relatives that she was pushing on the brake pedal with both feet but could not get the vehicle to stop.  A Toyota technician from California conveniently traveled to Indiana to download the EDR data before it was provided to the police.

It appears that Toyota may have to have covered up EDR information on brake position in other auto accident cases.  In a fatal Texas auto accident, the police were told that the EDR information on braking and acceleration were listed as “off.”  The attorney in the case believes that Toyota may have disabled the ability of the EDR to collect braking and acceleration information to avoid discovery by plaintiffs’ attorneys in court cases involving serious auto accidents including fatality accidents.  This would provide an explanation for the “off” message in the Texas case.  Toyota lawyers also have argued in litigation that the EDR is an experimental device and not reliable enough to be used for accident reconstruction in auto accident cases.  However, EDR devices have been used regularly in Toyota vehicles since 2001.  The experienced auto accident lawyers at NST Law will aggressively pursue admission of EDR data in Tennessee acceleration auto accident cases.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released a report earlier this month indicating that 52 people have been killed in auto accidents related to sudden unintended acceleration.  However, Toyota has engaged in discovery practices for years designed to prevent disclosure of EDT data that would establish the cause of the accidents.  If you are injured in Tennessee in a Toyota acceleration auto accident, it is imperative that the EDR data is preserved.  An experienced Tennessee auto accident lawyer will know how to take appropriate steps to obtain the EDR data and avoid destruction of this critical evidence.

At NST Law, we often employ experts and have experience in preserving and obtaining EDT data in Tennessee auto accidents as well as persuasively presenting this evidence to a jury.  Super Lawyers has recognized NST Law as one of the top 5% of law firms nationally.  If someone you love has been killed or seriously injured in a Toyota acceleration auto accident or any type of Tennessee auto accident, you should contact NST Law today.

Tennessee Wrongful Death Cases

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

If a person is killed by the negligent or intentional act of another, immediate family members may pursue an action for compensation under Tennessee’s wrongful death statute.  Under Tennessee’s wrongful death law, there are two types of actions that may be pursued by the family members of a person who is killed in an accident or by the intentional act of another.  The attorneys of Nahon, Saharovich & Trotz, PLC (NST Law) have many years of collective experience in handling Tennessee wrongful death and Tennessee survival actions and can help you seek just compensation for your loved ones.

A survival action is brought by the personal representative of someone who has been killed to compensate for the damages suffered by the deceased including pain and suffering and actual expenses incurred from the incident until the time of his death.  The crux of a survival action is that damages are awarded for the damages actually suffered by the deceased.  Under Tennessee law, a court will award only very limited compensation in a survival action if the person who is killed dies instantly.  Generally, the only compensation that can be awarded in this situation includes medical costs and funeral expenses.  The idea is that anyone who dies instantly does not experience any other loss (i.e. pain and suffering) because the death is instantaneous.

A wrongful death action awards to immediate family of someone who is killed for their own suffering and loss as a result of the death of their loved one.  The husband, wife, parent or child of the person who was killed may bring a wrongful death action.  To pursue a civil claim for wrongful death, the immediate family member that files the claim must establish certain elements:

  • Death of a human being
  • Caused by the negligence or intentional act of a 3rd party
  • The survival of family members who are suffering the loss of financial support, love, care, comfort

While any negligent or intentional act that causes the death of another can be the basis of a wrongful death action.  There are a number of types of cases that commonly give rise to wrongful death claims.

  • Vehicular accident
  • Medical malpractice
  • Occupational exposure to hazardous substances
  • Violent crimes

As a general rule under Tennessee wrongful death law, one can recover both economic and non-economic losses.  Pecuniary injury is the term used to refer to actual economic loss.  Non-pecuniary losses including loss of love, comfort and affection, resulting from the death of a loved one.  However, the pain and suffering of the decedent is not recoverable through the wrongful death action but only through the survival action brought by the estate of the decedent.  An experienced Tennessee wrongful death lawyer will help make sure the jury understands how long the deceased was conscious and the degree of suffering that must be compensated.  Damages available in a wrongful death action include the following: (1) loss of income from injury to death; (2) loss of future earning; (3) loss of parental guidance; (4) medical and funeral expenses; and (5) loss of love, companionship and comfort.

The court will consider factors such as the age, intelligence, education and earning capacity of the deceased as well as the circumstances of the immediate family members whom bring the action.  This can be a very difficult issue to establish and involves a certain degree of speculation about the decedent’s age life expectancy and potential earning capacity.  Under Tennessee wrongful death law, pecuniary loss is not limited to the deceased actual income, which is important in the case of retired persons and small children.  At NST Law we often employ the services of an economic expert to establish the lost future income in difficult cases where a person was not employed or had no earning history.  Super Lawyers has recognized NST Law as one of the top 5% of law firms nationally.  If someone you love has been killed by the careless or intentional misconduct of another, you should contact NST Law today.

Tennessee Busing Accidents: The Responsibility of Common Carriers

Saturday, May 1st, 2010

Many people never consider what a fundamental role buses pay in our everyday lives.  When we put our children on a bus as we send them off to school or jump on a city transit bus as we go to work or a shopping center, we are entrusting our safety to others.  Most of us never even consider the possibility that the bus may be involved in an accident or that we will be injured or killed.  This is somewhat naïve considering that from 1990 to 2001 there was an average of 50,000-63,000 bus crashes per year.

With bus accidents being this common, it is not surprising that between 15,000 and 21,000 people were injured in bus accidents each year between 1991 and 2004.  The real possibility of being seriously injured in a bus crash can result in significant emotional and financial consequences for the passengers as well as their dependants and loved ones.  The experienced bus accident law firm of Nahon, Saharovich & Trotz, PLC (NST Law) recognize the importance of aggressively pursuing fair compensation for the serious injuries or death suffered by you or your loves ones as a result of a busing accident caused by the negligence of others.

The high duty of care owed by a bus driver and busing company to its passengers comes from the legal classification of a bus as a common carrier.  A common carrier is a commercial enterprise publicly offering to transport people for a set fee.  To be a common carrier, the enterprise must offer services to the general public for a ticketed price.

A common carrier must exercise extreme caution and vigilantly guard against dangerous conditions.  Usually even minimal fault on the part of a bus driver or busing company may result in a portion of legal liability if a passenger is harmed, even if the injury was caused in part by another party.

The safety of the vulnerable traveling public is in the hands of those controlling the means of transportation.   A common carrier cannot transfer, delegate or assign its special duty of care to any other entity.  The busing company bears the responsibility of keeping its passengers safe.

As common carriers, busing companies must carefully operate, inspect and maintain their equipment and facilities.  Bus drivers and maintenance people must be properly trained and the bus service must be professional and cautious. The busing company must also take reasonable precautions to protect passengers from foreseeable hazardous behavior on the part of either its employees as well as other passengers.  Bus companies must make sure bus drivers are properly trained and drive legally and safely.  Bus doors, steps and handrails must be safely designed and maintained, and the bus must take care not to lurch dangerously when there are walking or standing passengers.  There are many special regulations that apply to buses as common carriers, and the experienced bus accident lawyers of NST Law will determine how these regulations apply to your case.

A bus company’s very high duty of care to it passengers is not unlimited. The busing company is not required to provide a complete guarantee of safety under extraordinary circumstance nor must it take precautions that radically deviate from its normal operation. Highly unusual and unpredictable accidents or events that cause harm to passengers may be beyond the scope of a busing company’s responsibility. In addition, courts hold passengers responsible for their own safety to some degree.  Bus passengers should conduct themselves reasonably under the circumstances, follow bus rules and not expose themselves to dangerous conditions when the bus has offered safer alternatives.

Despite the high duty of care owed by busing companies, a person who is injured by the negligence of a bus company must take appropriate steps following an accident that causes injury.  A person who is injured in a busing accident or by unsafe conditions on the bus should seek prompt medical treatment.  Because a bus is a common carrier, employees of the bus company will typically summon medical help for passengers who are injured.  Anyone who is injured should insist on a complete medical evaluation of any injuries including head, back and neck injuries.

A person injured in a Tennessee busing accident should also act promptly to retain an experienced attorney as the statute of limitations may create a bar to ones claim if they do not act promptly.  Many busing accidents involve bus lines that are owned by county or municipal governments which usually require special filing (notice) requirements and an even shorter period of time within which a claim must be brought.  The attorneys of NST Law are familiar with these special requirements and time limits under Tennessee law and can act promptly and diligently to ensure that your right to be compensated for your injuries and those of your family are not compromised.

There are many different potential parties who may be partially or totally responsible for injuries that are caused by a busing accident or other dangerous condition under the control of the busing company.  The lawyers of NST Law know the importance of identifying all appropriate parties who may bear responsibility for ones injuries early in a case so that an injured party is fully compensated.  Among those parties that may bear responsibility are the following:

  • The Busing Company – The busing company may be responsible for a collision caused by faulty brakes or tires or for inadequately trained or supervised drivers or maintenance employees.  The busing company is required to repair and maintain buses so that they are safe to operate.  Other hazards that are posed by poor maintenance of the bus are also the responsibility of the busing company.
  • Independent Maintenance Company – Busing company’s often contract with other company’s to maintain and repair their buses.  If the company fails to adequately maintain the bus, the maintenance company may be responsible for resulting injuries.
  • Government Entities – Many times government entities including cities and counties own transit bus lines.  If the bus driver or the public employee’s negligence result in injury to a passenger, the governmental entity can be liable.
  • School Districts/Boards – If a child is injured in a school bus accident, the school district or school board may be culpable.
  • Bus Driver – The bus driver may be liable if he drives carelessly or is under the influence but many times the driver may not have the means to pay a judgement.
  • Bus or Part Manufacturer – If the bus or parts on the bus are defective when they are put into the marketplace and cause an unreasonable risk of harm, the manufacturer or supplier may be responsible for a bus accident that results from the defect.
  • Driver of Other Vehicles – If a driver of another vehicle contributes to the accident, the other driver may also be a defendant.
  • Tour or Charter Company – Often bus trips are part of a tour package offered by a tour company.  The tour company may be liable for a tour related accident.

At NST Law, we will apply our familiarity with the special regulations that govern common carriers to the specifics of your bus accident.  Our lawyers recognize the importance of taking prompt action to preserve your claims and comply with all appropriate procedures and time limits for pursuing compensation for you injuries.  We will also carefully investigate the circumstances of your case to make sure all potentially responsible parties are part of your case.  NST Law has been recognized by Super Lawyers as one of the top 5% of law firms nationally.  If you or someone you love has been injured in a bus accident, you should contact NST Law today.